> David Woodhouse writes: > > > -a "$CC" = "gcc" > > Not worth it; they should upgrade the local gcc too. > If anything, they are getting a reminder that they need. The local gcc has no bearing on the compiler. The local compiler might not even be gcc - eg if they are cross building off non Linux systems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Hans Reiser
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Paul Jakma
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... David Woodhouse
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... John Morrison
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... John Morrison
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Hans Reiser
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Hans Reiser
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... alex
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Andre Pang
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... James Sutherland