On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:09:51 -0700 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 2. removed 'cancel_delayed_work()' from 'hfsplus_sync_fs()' because it is > > not > > enough to just cancel the job, we need to set the work_queued flag to > > zero > > as well. I could do this, but it is simpler to just remove this tiny > > optimization - we do not gain much with it. I caught this bug while doing > > some more testing. > > And lo, when I look at "what was changed", I see that this patchset > actually does *not* remove the cancel_delayed_work() call. What's up > with that? Ah, no. I was looking at the cancel_delayed_work() in hfs_put_super(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
