On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Seiji Aguchi wrote:

> > Those x86 specific ones are not really frequently raised vectors,
> > so enabling them all won't affect performance and readability of
> > the traces too much.
> 
> OK. I will unify these to a single tracepoint.
> "x86_irq_vector" or so?

I'd rather see a real generic one, which can be used by other
architectures for their esoteric non common vectors as well.

Something like misc_vector_entry/exit. Any better name is welcome :)

Thanks,

        tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to