On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Seiji Aguchi wrote: > > Those x86 specific ones are not really frequently raised vectors, > > so enabling them all won't affect performance and readability of > > the traces too much. > > OK. I will unify these to a single tracepoint. > "x86_irq_vector" or so?
I'd rather see a real generic one, which can be used by other architectures for their esoteric non common vectors as well. Something like misc_vector_entry/exit. Any better name is welcome :) Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/