Rob, Mike,
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 07:38 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/16/2012 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
On 20120716-16:46, Rob Herring wrote:
From: Rob Herring<rob.herr...@calxeda.com>
With commit 766e6a4ec602d0c107 (clk: add DT clock binding support),
compiling with OF&& !COMMON_CLK is broken.
Hi Rob,
Thanks for sending this quickly.
<snip>
@@ -313,19 +314,19 @@ int clk_add_alias(const char *alias, const char
*alias_dev_name, char *id,
struct device_node;
struct of_phandle_args;
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+#if defined(CONFIG_OF)&& defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device_node *np, int index);
struct clk *of_clk_get_by_name(struct device_node *np, const char *name);
struct clk *of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
#else
static inline struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device_node *np, int index)
{
- return NULL;
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
So how is this expected to work on platforms (like OMAP) which have
CONFIG_OF enabled but not CONFIG_COMMON_CLK?
Archit has been seeing issues with failed clk_get's in the omap dss
driver on linux-next.
The clk_gets pass a valid dev pointer and an alias/con-id.
With the $Subject patch, the of_clk_get_by_name() for our builds always
returns a ERR_PTR(-EINVAL).
Even if we do get the right of_clk_get_by_name() built in,
there is another issue on OMAP where in we have CONFIG_OF
enabled/selected by default for all OMAP2+ builds, even when we
*do not* pass a dt blob to the kernel.
So would the below code fail in such cases because it expects a
valid of_node to be populated for a device (which also has clock
information in it)? if CONFIG_OF is set.
struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
{
const char *dev_id = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
struct clk *clk;
if (dev) {
---->
Any reason why this isn't
if (dev->of_node) {
---->
clk = of_clk_get_by_name(dev->of_node, con_id);
if (clk && __clk_get(clk))
return clk;
}
return clk_get_sys(dev_id, con_id);
}
regards,
Rajendra
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
