3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: William Dauchy <wdau...@gmail.com>
commit 96dcadc2fdd111dca90d559f189a30c65394451a upstream.
Adding rate limit on `Lock reclaim failed` messages since it could fill
up system logs
Signed-off-by: William Dauchy <wdau...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: add the 'NFS:' prefix at the same time]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -1261,8 +1261,9 @@ restart:
spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
list_for_each_entry(lock, &state->lock_states,
ls_locks) {
if (!(lock->ls_flags &
NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED))
- printk("%s: Lock reclaim
failed!\n",
- __func__);
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("NFS: "
+ "%s: Lock reclaim "
+ "failed!\n", __func__);
}
spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
nfs4_put_open_state(state);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
