From: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
commit e0c23279c9f800c403f37511484d9014ac83adec upstream.
Stable note: Not tracked on Bugzilla. THP and compaction was found to
aggressively reclaim pages and stall systems under different
situations that was addressed piecemeal over time.
If compaction can proceed, shrink_zones() stops doing any work but its
callers still call shrink_slab() which raises the priority and potentially
sleeps. This is unnecessary and wasteful so this patch aborts direct
reclaim/compaction entirely if compaction can proceed.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan....@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <jwei...@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwbo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2037,14 +2037,19 @@ restart:
*
* If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
* scan then give up on it.
+ *
+ * This function returns true if a zone is being reclaimed for a costly
+ * high-order allocation and compaction is either ready to begin or deferred.
+ * This indicates to the caller that it should retry the allocation or fail.
*/
-static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
+ bool should_abort_reclaim = false;
for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -2061,19 +2066,20 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, s
continue; /* Let kswapd poll it */
if (COMPACTION_BUILD) {
/*
- * If we already have plenty of memory
- * free for compaction, don't free any
- * more. Even though compaction is
- * invoked for any non-zero order,
- * only frequent costly order
- * reclamation is disruptive enough to
- * become a noticable problem, like
- * transparent huge page allocations.
+ * If we already have plenty of memory free for
+ * compaction in this zone, don't free any more.
+ * Even though compaction is invoked for any
+ * non-zero order, only frequent costly order
+ * reclamation is disruptive enough to become a
+ * noticable problem, like transparent huge page
+ * allocations.
*/
if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
(compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order) ||
- compaction_deferred(zone)))
+ compaction_deferred(zone))) {
+ should_abort_reclaim = true;
continue;
+ }
}
/*
* This steals pages from memory cgroups over softlimit
@@ -2092,6 +2098,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, s
shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
}
+
+ return should_abort_reclaim;
}
static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
@@ -2156,7 +2164,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_page
sc->nr_scanned = 0;
if (!priority)
disable_swap_token(sc->mem_cgroup);
- shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+ if (shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc))
+ break;
+
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
* over limit cgroups
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
