On 7/25/2012 11:35 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> +
> +static struct rtc_class_ops tps65910_rtc_ops = {

const?

> +     .read_time      = tps65910_rtc_read_time,
> +     .set_time       = tps65910_rtc_set_time,
> +     .read_alarm     = tps65910_rtc_read_alarm,
> +     .set_alarm      = tps65910_rtc_set_alarm,
> +     .alarm_irq_enable = tps65910_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit tps65910_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct tps65910 *tps65910 = NULL;
> +     struct tps65910_rtc *tps_rtc = NULL;
> +     struct tps65910_board *pmic_plat_data;
> +     int ret = -EINVAL;
> +     int irq = 0;
> +     u32 rtc_reg;

It seems like all the above assignments are useless as they're
overwritten later in this function. Can you remove the assignments?

> +
> +     tps65910 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> +
> +     tps_rtc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct tps65910_rtc),
> +                     GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!tps_rtc)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     /* Clear pending interrupts */
> +     ret = regmap_read(tps65910->regmap, TPS65910_RTC_STATUS, &rtc_reg);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     ret = regmap_write(tps65910->regmap, TPS65910_RTC_STATUS, rtc_reg);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Enabling tps65910-RTC.\n");

Hmph, looks more like stopping the RTC.

> +     rtc_reg = TPS65910_RTC_CTRL_STOP_RTC;
> +     ret = regmap_write(tps65910->regmap, TPS65910_RTC_CTRL, rtc_reg);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     pmic_plat_data = dev_get_platdata(tps65910->dev);
> +     irq = pmic_plat_data->irq_base;
> +     if (irq <= 0) {
> +             dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Wake up is not possible as irq = %d\n",
> +                     irq);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     irq += TPS65910_IRQ_RTC_ALARM;
> +     ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
> +             tps65910_rtc_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
> +             dev_name(&tps_rtc->rtc->dev), &pdev->dev);

How does this work? It doesn't look like tps_rtc->rtc is assigned until
down there at the rtc_device_register() call.

> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +     device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> +
> +     tps_rtc->rtc = rtc_device_register(pdev->name, &pdev->dev,
> +             &tps65910_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> +     if (IS_ERR(tps_rtc->rtc)) {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(tps_rtc->rtc);
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "RTC device register: err %d\n", ret);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to