On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:20:53AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > I agree in general, but I don't see how this is a regression in this > change - the arizona pdata doesn't specify an IRQ base anywhere, and > hence the IRQ base is already dynamically allocated...
> The (regmap-irq) API (in the patch I sent) does support optionally > specifying a base if you want, it's just that the arizona-irq.c patch I > sent didn't specify a base, since the original code didn't. I see. It sounded like the regmap patch had the regression, not the device specific patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
