> Why then is there EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and EXPORT_SYMBOL? As long as you have 
> them both, one can and will, assume that what you say above is not the intent

Then I would look back at the list and previous statements where the
intent has repeatedly been made clear by several developers.

EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL was intended to mark internal symbols that absolutely
couldn't be used by something non derivative.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to