From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>

Invert the uci->valid check so that the later block can be aligned on
the first indentation level of the function. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
index 4873e62db6a1..63a956865022 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
@@ -276,19 +276,18 @@ static struct platform_device     *microcode_pdev;
 static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu)
 {
        struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+       enum ucode_state ustate;
        int err = 0;
 
-       if (uci->valid) {
-               enum ucode_state ustate;
-
-               ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, 
&microcode_pdev->dev);
-               if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
-                       apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
-               else
-                       if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR)
-                               err = -EINVAL;
-       }
+       if (!uci->valid)
+               return err;
 
+       ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev);
+       if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
+               apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
+       else
+               if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR)
+                       err = -EINVAL;
        return err;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.11.rc1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to