This patch cleans up the highmem sanity check code by simplifying the range
checks with a pre-calculated size_limit.  This patch should otherwise have no
functional impact on behavior.

This patch also removes a redundant (bank->start < vmalloc_limit) check, since
this is already covered by the !highmem condition.

Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cy...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vita...@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |   19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 3d685c6..662684b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -899,10 +899,15 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 
        for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) {
                struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j];
+               phys_addr_t size_limit;
+
                *bank = meminfo.bank[i];
+               size_limit = bank->size;
 
                if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit)
                        highmem = 1;
+               else
+                       size_limit = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
 
                bank->highmem = highmem;
 
@@ -911,8 +916,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
                 * Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping
                 * the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later.
                 */
-               if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit &&
-                   bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) {
+               if (!highmem && bank->size > size_limit) {
                        if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) {
                                printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, "
                                                 "ignoring high memory\n");
@@ -921,12 +925,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
                                        (meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank));
                                meminfo.nr_banks++;
                                i++;
-                               bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
+                               bank[1].size -= size_limit;
                                bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit;
                                bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1;
                                j++;
                        }
-                       bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
+                       bank->size = size_limit;
                }
 #else
                /*
@@ -944,14 +948,13 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
                 * Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap
                 * the vmalloc area.
                 */
-               if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit)
-                       unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
+               if (bank->size > size_limit) {
                        printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx "
                               "to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n",
                               (unsigned long long)bank->start,
                               (unsigned long long)bank->start + bank->size - 1,
-                              (unsigned long long)bank->start + newsize - 1);
-                       bank->size = newsize;
+                              (unsigned long long)bank->start + size_limit - 
1);
+                       bank->size = size_limit;
                }
 #endif
                if (!bank->highmem && bank->start + bank->size > 
arm_lowmem_limit)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to