On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 01:36:53PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:59:50PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > The check "if (disks[dr]->queue)" check is bogus, if we reach there
> > for each dr should exist an queue allocated (note that we decrement dr
> > first on entering the loop).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesin...@canonical.com>
> 
> As mentioned in second patch, I like going trhough full array of drives
> and do cleanup as needed instead of relying on "dr" variable. 
> 
> But if you don't like that, then I am not as such against this approach.
> Was just trying to keep all put_disk() at one place.

Ok, I'll drop this, and do a full cleanup. I just ended up doing the
minimal work, but I'm not against cleaning this. I still want to keep
the second patch, as being a simple/appropriate bug fix for stable. I'll
submit a new series soon. Thanks for looking at this series.

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 

-- 
[]'s
Herton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to