Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1

[Rogerio Brito]

On Feb 11 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The reiserfs nfs problem in standard 2.4 is very simple -- it'll
> barf as soon as you run out of file handle/inode cache. Any workload
> that accesses enough files in parallel can trigger it.

        I'm just trying to evaluate if I should use reiserfs here or
        not: is this phenomenon that you describe above happening
        independently of whether I choose the knfsd or userspace nfsd?

        From your message, I got the impression that it would happen
        with knfsd only, but I'm just checking before I make a wrong
        decision.


        Thanks from a humble (and ignorant) network admin, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/