On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 04:04:44PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > +
> > + while (i && (gwr & 0x01)) {
> > + inb(gmux_data->iostart + GMUX_PORT_READ);
> > + gwr = inb(gmux_data->iostart + GMUX_PORT_WRITE);
> > + msleep(100);
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense if the msleep was before reading the port
> again? Otherwise there's no substantial dely between the first and
> second times we read it.
Mm. I'm doing the same as the ACPI implementation - it may be that
reading GMUX_PORT_READ triggers the update of GMUX_PORT_WRITE? Hard to
know without the docs.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
