On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> There was a plan to place ab8500_irq_get_virq() calls in each AB8500
> child device prior to requesting an IRQ, but as we're no longer using
> Device Tree to collect our IRQ numbers, it's actually better to allow
> the core to do this during device registration time. So the IRQ number
> we pull from its resource has already been converted to a virtual IRQ.
>
> CC: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>

This is looking good, I guess you need all patches to go in at the
same time so Dmitry's ACK is required.

FWIW:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

BTW: this makes me suspect that the public ab8500_irq_get_virq()
interface can be *deleted* and the function made static in the
AB8500 driver, right?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to