On 08/13/2012 03:16 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 08/09, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

* Oleg Nesterov | 2012-08-08 15:14:57 [+0200]:

What I miss right now is an interface to tell the user/gdb that there is a
program that hit a global breakpoint and is waiting for further instructions.
A "tail -f trace" does not work and may contain also a lot of other
informations. I've been thinking about a poll()able file which returns pids of
tasks which are put on hold. Other suggestions?

Honestly, I am not sure this is that useful...

How would you notify gdb that there is a new task that hit a breakpoint?
Or learn yourself?

But why do we need this?

Shouldn't we learn somehow that a process hits a breakpoint? The task
was not yet monitored by gdb.

OK, you do not need to convince me, I try to never argue with
new features.

If there is a simple mechanism, I would switch to it. Right now I think
about using this "notification mechanism" to auto-exlude the listener
(and its parents) from the list of possible targets. So I don't freeze
the whole system while I have a breakpoint at malloc() in libc.

However, I certainly dislike TASK_TRACED in uprobe_wait_traced().
And sleeping in ->handler() is not fair to other consumers.

I added it as the last task in current consumer. I could move it out of
the consumer loop and freeze it after all consumer are handled but then
I lose the filter member (which is currently NULL, I know).

And I do not think you should modify ptrace_attach() at all.
gdb/user can wakeup the task after PTRACE_ATTACH itself.

I see. gdb / strace --pid $num" gdb does PTRACE_ATTACH and waits
afterwords in wait() indefinitely for the SIGSTOP which is blocked
since the process is already in TASK_TRACED. This is nice since the
signals are blocked and are delivered once the task is unfrozed.

Oleg.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to