On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> +
> +void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
> +{
> + return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END,
> + GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, -1,
> + __builtin_return_address(0));
> +}
> +
What is the reason for using a separate virtual address range for the
modules instead of falling back to the default module_alloc function
that uses vmalloc_exec()?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
