> This is true, but one thing I'd really like to have is controlled buffer > overrun, which TCP *doesn't* have. I really think an ad hoc UDP protocol > (I've already begun sketching on the details) is more appropriate in this > particular case. Explain 'controlled buffer overrun'. BTW if you make it UDP please include something like SHA hash or tea hash and shared secret - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/
- LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Ivan Passos
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Ivan Passos
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9... James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds ov... Pavel Machek
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds ov... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speed... Werner Almesberger
- Re: LILO and serial speed... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speed... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speed... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speed... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speed... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speed... Tim Wright
- Re: LILO and serial speed... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speed... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speed... James Sutherland