On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:05:42PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:57:00PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > Guys, would the patch below be more-less acceptible?
> > In inotify I think we could pass "parent" as NULL and use general
> > encode engine then (ie it will look like someone called for
> > name_to_handle_at on inotify target).
>
> Wait. What the hell are you going to do with those afterwards?
> Again, there's a shitload of filesystems that cannot be exported
> over NFS, exactly because there's no way to implement sanely
> working fhandles. And idiotify is allowed for all of them.
Yes, just recognized that, Al. There will be no way to restore them
from fhandle provided via fdinfo. /me scratching the head...
> You *can't* decode anything fhandle-like on e.g. sysfs. Or procfs.
> Or configfs. Or any network filesystem (I'd argue that we should simply
> ban idiotify on those, but good luck doing that). You *can* do that
> for FAT derivatives, but only if you have parent directory when creating
> that sucker.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
