Il 18/08/2012 01:08, Theodore Ts'o ha scritto:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:47:04AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
Great. I'll remove the calls for ext3/ext4 when I'll submit the
second version of the patch.
FYI, I have the following patch my ext4 tree, so I could do more
intensive testing. I'll let folks know if anything goes horribly
wrong, but I'm pretty sure this should be safe.
Yeah, I'm agree. It should be safe.
- Ted
From 81f74e743344217487792e4190f9478963d1bb21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:00:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: drop lock_super()/unlock_super()
We don't need lock_super()/unlock_super() any more, since the places
where it is used, we are protected by the s_umount r/w semaphore.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Stornelli <[email protected]>
---
I think the patches will go via Al's tree so if Al is agree I'll submit
the patches without modify ext4 at this point. Al, let me know if we
want to proceed in a different way.
Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
