> > * Rather than having to do the #ifdef here, I think it would be > better if > > the PWM subsystem provided stub functions for pwm_request, > pwm_config, > > pwm_enable, pwm_disable and pwm_free that do nothing, so you can in > effect > > let the compiler optimize away the above code. > > That's actually on my TODO list, but I think it needs to wait until we > have gotten rid of all legacy implementations. The stubs would have to > move into the !CONFIG_PWM branch, which will in turn break because the > legacy implementations would provide non-inlined duplicates. > > Thierry
OK, then it's better to wait fixing that first. Bryan, please just ignore this patch. I'll resend the patch later. Thank you. Best Regards, Milo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
