On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're > > duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process > > of enabling it for Device Tree. As there are quite a few steps > > taken during the registration process, it makes sense to break > > them up into more manageable chunks. This patch will aid us. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > I understand you have used this approach before so: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Does this comment take back your previous one: NOTE: it seems this patch set contains some churn. First you add in the forked device init, put in a big chunk of code and then in the *same* patch set delete it again. It's not like we're dying to see all the development history... can this be squashed down a bit? ... hence leave the patch-set as it is? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
