IO-APIC and PIC use the same resume routines when IRQ remapping is enabled or disabled. So it should be safe to mask the other APICs for the IRQ-remapping-disabled case too.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c index 41681b3..109380a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c @@ -2233,16 +2233,15 @@ static void lapic_resume(void) return; local_irq_save(flags); - if (irq_remapping_enabled) { - /* - * IO-APIC and PIC have their own resume routines. - * We just mask them here to make sure the interrupt - * subsystem is completely quiet while we enable x2apic - * and interrupt-remapping. - */ - mask_ioapic_entries(); - legacy_pic->mask_all(); - } + + /* + * IO-APIC and PIC have their own resume routines. + * We just mask them here to make sure the interrupt + * subsystem is completely quiet while we enable x2apic + * and interrupt-remapping. + */ + mask_ioapic_entries(); + legacy_pic->mask_all(); if (x2apic_mode) enable_x2apic(); -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

