On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Jeremy Jackson wrote: > Next, gcc doesn't generate any code which would be placed in the > stack, nor does it generate any calls/jumps to the stack area. Unfortunately, you can't count on this. Objective C, for one, requires an executable stack. While there have been "unofficial" patches (Solar Designer) to lock out executing the stack for a long time, and it does work in most cases, this isn't really doable as a general solution. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Jeremy Jackson
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Alan Cox
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? James Sutherland
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Bruce Harada
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? William T Wilson
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Jeremy Jackson
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Gerhard Mack
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fi... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Is this the ultimate s... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Is this the ultimate s... Andreas Bombe
- Re: Is this the ultimate s... Xavier Bestel