On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:50:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:15:44 +0300 > Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: > > > Even if we enter our IRQ handler just to notice > > that the our device didn't generate the IRQ, > > that still means "handling" and IRQ, so let's > > return IRQ_HANDLED. > > That looks wrong - you'll defeat the stuck IRQ protection. If we didn't > cause the IRQ then we are IRQ_NONE ?
that's true. I'll drop this patch from the list. My bad. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
