Em Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Andrew Vagin <ava...@openvz.org> wrote: > > 18 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 255 deletions(-) > > -static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool, > > - union perf_event *event, > > - struct perf_sample *sample, > > - struct perf_evsel *evsel, > > - struct machine *machine) > > +static int process_sample_event(struct perf_event_context *ectx) > > { > > - struct perf_annotate *ann = container_of(tool, struct perf_annotate, > > tool); > > + struct perf_sample *sample = ectx->sample; > > + struct perf_annotate *ann = container_of(ectx->tool, struct > > perf_annotate, tool); > > struct addr_location al; > > that looks like a nice cleanliness win. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
I don't like it, in most cases it just moves variables from the function signature to the start of the function. I do agree tho that we should reduce the number of parameters as much as we can, as I did removing that pevent one that we used to look up event_format from the sample ID, that just was not natural as we already had the evsel and did the lookup when reading the perf.data headers, so it was just a matter of linking evsel to event_format at that point and remove the pevent parameter and eliminate the needless relookups, see: "perf evsel: Cache associated event_format" fcf65bf149afa91b875ffde4455967cb63ee0be9 In the above function signature there is already room for tool specific state in perf_tool/container_of, the other parameters are per event natural objects. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/