On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 15:11 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Good progress there, there's still a few things though: > > > > - the point also raised by Steven, I'm pretty sure that the placing of > > the debugfs files unfortunate. I would much rather see something > > like /debug/perf/persistent/$foo, also dropping your > > perf_event_desc::dir_name. > > Ok, how do we want to do the per-CPU layout there? Like this: > > /debug/perf/persistent/mce_record0 > /debug/perf/persistent/mce_record1 > ... > > or rather > > /debug/perf/persistent/cpu0/mce_record > /debug/perf/persistent/cpu1/mce_record > > ?
Definitely the second one. The first one is just ugly. The second is more in line to the tracing directories too: /debug/tracing/per_cpu/cpu0/... -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
