Hi Ingo,

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ido Yariv <i...@wizery.com> wrote:
> 
> > vSMP Foundation does not require to serialize CPA by guaranteeing that
> > the most recent TLB entry will always be used.
> > 
> > To avoid needless contention on cpa_lock, do not lock/unlock it if it
> > isn't necessary.
> > 
> > Based on work by Shai Fultheim <s...@scalemp.com>.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <i...@wizery.com>
> > Acked-by: Shai Fultheim <s...@scalemp.com>
> > ---
> > Changes from v1:
> > - Use a synthetic CPUID bit and a use static_cpu_has() as suggested by
> >   H. Peter Avnin
> > 
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h |    1 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c         |   10 ++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c            |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > index 6b7ee5f..92303a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_EXTD_APICID    (3*32+26) /* has extended APICID (8 
> > bits) */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_DCM     (3*32+27) /* multi-node processor */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF     (3*32+28) /* APERFMPERF */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_NO_CPA_LOCK    (3*32+29) /* Serializing cpa is not 
> > required */
> 
> Patch looks mostly good, but could we please use some more 
> hardware-ish name, instead of referring to a kernel lock?

Sure thing. How about X86_FEATURE_TLB_RELIABLE?

Thanks,
Ido.

>From fc3adcd1a9a86d65836d461bc22f54955ba3fc82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ido Yariv <i...@wizery.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:17:56 +0300
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86/pat: Avoid contention on cpa_lock if possible

vSMP Foundation does not require to serialize CPA by guaranteeing that
the most recent TLB entry will always be used.

To avoid needless contention on cpa_lock, do not lock/unlock it if it
isn't necessary.

Based on work by Shai Fultheim <s...@scalemp.com>.

Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <i...@wizery.com>
Acked-by: Shai Fultheim <s...@scalemp.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c         |   10 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c            |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 6b7ee5f..9b3d075 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_EXTD_APICID        (3*32+26) /* has extended APICID (8 
bits) */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_DCM     (3*32+27) /* multi-node processor */
 #define X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF (3*32+28) /* APERFMPERF */
+#define X86_FEATURE_TLB_RELIABLE (3*32+29) /* Serializing cpa is not required 
*/
 
 /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XMM3       (4*32+ 0) /* "pni" SSE-3 */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
index f655f2c..6e245d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
@@ -235,9 +235,19 @@ static void __init vsmp_platform_setup(void)
        set_vsmp_pv_ops();
 }
 
+static void __cpuinit vsmp_set_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+       /*
+        * vSMP guarantees that the most recent TLB entry will always be used,
+        * so we can avoid serializing cpa
+        */
+       set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_TLB_RELIABLE);
+}
+
 const __refconst struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_vsmp = {
        .name                   = "ScaleMP vSMP Foundation",
        .detect                 = detect_vsmp_box,
        .init_platform          = vsmp_platform_setup,
+       .set_cpu_features       = vsmp_set_cpu_features,
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_vsmp);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index a718e0d..bc4720e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct cpa_data {
  * entries change the page attribute in parallel to some other cpu
  * splitting a large page entry along with changing the attribute.
  */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpa_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(_cpa_lock);
 
 #define CPA_FLUSHTLB 1
 #define CPA_ARRAY 2
@@ -110,6 +110,22 @@ static inline unsigned long highmap_end_pfn(void)
 # define debug_pagealloc 0
 #endif
 
+static inline void cpa_lock(void)
+{
+       if (debug_pagealloc || static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TLB_RELIABLE))
+               return;
+
+       spin_lock(&_cpa_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void cpa_unlock(void)
+{
+       if (debug_pagealloc || static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TLB_RELIABLE))
+               return;
+
+       spin_unlock(&_cpa_lock);
+}
+
 static inline int
 within(unsigned long addr, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
@@ -509,11 +525,9 @@ static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long 
address)
        pgprot_t ref_prot;
        struct page *base;
 
-       if (!debug_pagealloc)
-               spin_unlock(&cpa_lock);
+       cpa_unlock();
        base = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK, 0);
-       if (!debug_pagealloc)
-               spin_lock(&cpa_lock);
+       cpa_lock();
        if (!base)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -801,11 +815,9 @@ static int __change_page_attr_set_clr(struct cpa_data 
*cpa, int checkalias)
                if (cpa->flags & (CPA_ARRAY | CPA_PAGES_ARRAY))
                        cpa->numpages = 1;
 
-               if (!debug_pagealloc)
-                       spin_lock(&cpa_lock);
+               cpa_lock();
                ret = __change_page_attr(cpa, checkalias);
-               if (!debug_pagealloc)
-                       spin_unlock(&cpa_lock);
+               cpa_unlock();
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
 
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to