From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mcken...@linaro.org>
Commit 1217ed1b (rcu: permit rcu_read_unlock() to be called while holding
runqueue locks) made rcu_initiate_boost() restore irq state when releasing
the rcu_node structure's ->lock, but failed to update the header comment
accordingly. This commit therefore brings the header comment up to date.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mcken...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index c930a47..3ea60c9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -1193,9 +1193,9 @@ static int rcu_boost_kthread(void *arg)
* kthread to start boosting them. If there is an expedited grace
* period in progress, it is always time to boost.
*
- * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases,
- * but irqs remain disabled. The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal,
- * so we don't need to worry about it going away.
+ * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases.
+ * The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal, so we don't need to worry
+ * about it going away.
*/
static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
{
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
