On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do > >> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a > >> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't > >> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in > >> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that > >> part (including the user manual). > > > > Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then. > > Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where? > i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-)
I will apply them these days and then let them stay in linux-next for a few days. So, I'd think they should go in for rc6. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
