> Gotta say this capability name is confusing. Naming is > CAP_PRE_SECURE_BOOT or something along the lines might be a better > choice. When I just look at this name, I sure thought this > CAP_SECURE_FIRMWARE true means it is a secure boot capable firmware.
Given there is nothing secure about it would it also be better to call it AUTHENTICATED_BOOT ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
