On 09/05/2012 09:55 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Michael Wang wrote: > >> Since the cachep and cachep->slabp_cache's l3 alien are in the same lock >> class, >> fake report generated. > > Ahh... That is a key insight into why this occurs. > >> This should not happen since we already have init_lock_keys() which will >> reassign the lock class for both l3 list and l3 alien. > > Right. I was wondering why we still get intermitted reports on this. > >> This patch will invoke init_lock_keys() after we done enable_cpucache() >> instead of before to avoid the fake DEADLOCK report. > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
Thanks for your review. And add Paul to the cc list(my skills on mailing is really poor...). Regards, Michael Wang > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
