On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:03:26PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:22:24 -0700 Kent Overstreet <koverstr...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Had to shuffle the code around a bit (where bi_rw and bi_end_io were
> > set), but shouldn't really be anything tricky here
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstr...@google.com>
> > CC: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
> > CC: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/raid5.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > index 7c19dbe..ebe43f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > @@ -561,14 +561,6 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct
> > stripe_head_state *s)
> > bi = &sh->dev[i].req;
> > rbi = &sh->dev[i].rreq; /* For writing to replacement */
> >
> > - bi->bi_rw = rw;
> > - rbi->bi_rw = rw;
> > - if (rw & WRITE) {
> > - bi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_write_request;
> > - rbi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_write_request;
> > - } else
> > - bi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_read_request;
> > -
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > rrdev = rcu_dereference(conf->disks[i].replacement);
> > smp_mb(); /* Ensure that if rrdev is NULL, rdev won't be */
> > @@ -643,7 +635,14 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct
> > stripe_head_state *s)
> >
> > set_bit(STRIPE_IO_STARTED, &sh->state);
> >
> > + bio_reset(bi);
> > bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
> > + bi->bi_rw = rw;
> > + bi->bi_end_io = (rw & WRITE)
> > + ? raid5_end_write_request
> > + : raid5_end_read_request;
> > + bi->bi_private = sh;
> > +
> > pr_debug("%s: for %llu schedule op %ld on disc %d\n",
> > __func__, (unsigned long long)sh->sector,
> > bi->bi_rw, i);
> > @@ -657,12 +656,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct
> > stripe_head_state *s)
> > if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
> > bi->bi_rw |= REQ_FLUSH;
> >
> > - bi->bi_flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
> > - bi->bi_idx = 0;
> > bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = STRIPE_SIZE;
> > bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_offset = 0;
> > bi->bi_size = STRIPE_SIZE;
> > - bi->bi_next = NULL;
> > if (rrdev)
> > set_bit(R5_DOUBLE_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> > generic_make_request(bi);
> > @@ -674,7 +670,14 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct
> > stripe_head_state *s)
> >
> > set_bit(STRIPE_IO_STARTED, &sh->state);
> >
> > + bio_reset(rbi);
> > rbi->bi_bdev = rrdev->bdev;
> > + rbi->bi_rw = rw;
> > + rbi->bi_end_io = (rw & WRITE)
> > + ? raid5_end_write_request
> > + : raid5_end_read_request;
>
> 'rbi->bi_end_io' can only ever be raid5_end_write_request. We only get here
> on a write.
> I'd be OK with
> BUG_ON(!(rw & WRITE));
> but I don't want the condition in the assignment.
I was thinking to myself that if I was doing a bit more with that code,
I'd factor out all the code in the if (rdev) {} into a separate function
that was called twice there. But, I didn't do that here so you're right
- I'll change it and stick a BUG_ON() there.
> The rest looks quite sane.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
