From: Jens Taprogge <[email protected]> Previously the return value from tpci200_interrupt was not quite correct if a slot had caused an interrupt but no handler was instellalled: IRQ_NONE was returned. However in this case we react to the interrupt by disabling the IPack device interrupt.
Basically there are two cases the code now distinguishes: - The tpci200 has raised an interrupt. We handle it and return IRQ_HANDLED. - Our device did not raise an interrupt. We return IRQ_NONE. Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <[email protected]> --- drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c index b1ddbe3..0cbaf3a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c +++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c @@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ static irqreturn_t tpci200_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = (struct tpci200_board *) dev_id; int i; unsigned short status_reg; - irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; struct slot_irq *slot_irq; /* Read status register */ @@ -130,7 +129,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tpci200_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) continue; slot_irq = rcu_dereference(tpci200->slots[i].irq); if (slot_irq) { - ret = tpci200_slot_irq(slot_irq); + tpci200_slot_irq(slot_irq); } else { dev_info(&tpci200->info->pdev->dev, "No registered ISR for slot [%d:%d]!. IRQ will be disabled.\n", @@ -141,9 +140,11 @@ static irqreturn_t tpci200_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) } } rcu_read_unlock(); - } - return ret; + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } else { + return IRQ_NONE; + } } static int tpci200_register(struct tpci200_board *tpci200) -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
