3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Is this useful for 3.2 or does it depend on any other later changes?
(All I know is that it builds cleanly.)
------------------
From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
commit 5e1782d224c79b26ab7d5c31e3f87657000714fb upstream.
Testing and works with the -modesetting driver,
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <ja...@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 5 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h | 10 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
@@ -1089,6 +1089,11 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
.master_drop = vmw_master_drop,
.open = vmw_driver_open,
.postclose = vmw_postclose,
+
+ .dumb_create = vmw_dumb_create,
+ .dumb_map_offset = vmw_dumb_map_offset,
+ .dumb_destroy = vmw_dumb_destroy,
+
.fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = drm_open,
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
@@ -641,6 +641,16 @@ int vmw_kms_readback(struct vmw_private
int vmw_kms_update_layout_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv);
+int vmw_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_device *dev,
+ struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args);
+
+int vmw_dumb_map_offset(struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t handle,
+ uint64_t *offset);
+int vmw_dumb_destroy(struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_device *dev,
+ uint32_t handle);
/**
* Overlay control - vmwgfx_overlay.c
*/
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c
@@ -1950,3 +1950,76 @@ err_ref:
vmw_resource_unreference(&res);
return ret;
}
+
+
+int vmw_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_device *dev,
+ struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args)
+{
+ struct vmw_private *dev_priv = vmw_priv(dev);
+ struct vmw_master *vmaster = vmw_master(file_priv->master);
+ struct vmw_user_dma_buffer *vmw_user_bo;
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *tmp;
+ int ret;
+
+ args->pitch = args->width * ((args->bpp + 7) / 8);
+ args->size = args->pitch * args->height;
+
+ vmw_user_bo = kzalloc(sizeof(*vmw_user_bo), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (vmw_user_bo == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = ttm_read_lock(&vmaster->lock, true);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ kfree(vmw_user_bo);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = vmw_dmabuf_init(dev_priv, &vmw_user_bo->dma, args->size,
+ &vmw_vram_sys_placement, true,
+ &vmw_user_dmabuf_destroy);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ goto out_no_dmabuf;
+
+ tmp = ttm_bo_reference(&vmw_user_bo->dma.base);
+ ret = ttm_base_object_init(vmw_fpriv(file_priv)->tfile,
+ &vmw_user_bo->base,
+ false,
+ ttm_buffer_type,
+ &vmw_user_dmabuf_release, NULL);
+ if (unlikely(ret != 0))
+ goto out_no_base_object;
+
+ args->handle = vmw_user_bo->base.hash.key;
+
+out_no_base_object:
+ ttm_bo_unref(&tmp);
+out_no_dmabuf:
+ ttm_read_unlock(&vmaster->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int vmw_dumb_map_offset(struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t handle,
+ uint64_t *offset)
+{
+ struct ttm_object_file *tfile = vmw_fpriv(file_priv)->tfile;
+ struct vmw_dma_buffer *out_buf;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vmw_user_dmabuf_lookup(tfile, handle, &out_buf);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *offset = out_buf->base.addr_space_offset;
+ vmw_dmabuf_unreference(&out_buf);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int vmw_dumb_destroy(struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_device *dev,
+ uint32_t handle)
+{
+ return ttm_ref_object_base_unref(vmw_fpriv(file_priv)->tfile,
+ handle, TTM_REF_USAGE);
+}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
