On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:40:42PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On 09/17/2012 11:46 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > Patch1 fix new found possible bug. > > > > Patch2 use async algorithm to replace the synchronous algorithm to rebind > > idle workers. > > > > The synchronous algorithm requires 3 hand shakes, it introduces much > > complicated. > > > > The new async algorithm does not do any synchronization. it removes > > the idle workers from idle_list to ensure the local-wake-up is correct > > instead. > > > > Patch3-7 do simple cleanup > > > > Patch2-7 are ready for for-next. I have other devlopment and cleanup for > > workqueue, > > should I wait this patchset merged or send them at the same time? > > Hello, Tejun: > > Please defer Patch3-7, because they conflict with the merged one. > > Could you please review and merge the the Patch2(async idle rebinding). > I have made some effort to write/review/check it.
I merged 2-7 to for-3.7. I edited descriptions and comments somewhat but everything else looked good to me. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
