Actually, there are some minor problems here (both patches merged,
ixp4xx only):

Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> writes:

> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/cpu.h
> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@
>  
>  static inline u32 ixp4xx_read_feature_bits(void)
>  {
> -     u32 val = ~*IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2;
> +     u32 val = ~__raw_readl(IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2);
>  

This is all fine, but

> @@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ static inline u32 ixp4xx_read_feature_bits(void)
>  
>  static inline void ixp4xx_write_feature_bits(u32 value)
>  {
> -     *IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2 = ~value;
> +     __raw_writel(~cpu_to_le32(value), IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2);
>  }

The EXP_CFG2 register is already in host order, no need for
cpu_to_le32() as the replaced code clearly shows.

Can you merge both IXP4xx parts (in the two patches) and fix the above,
please? Thanks.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to