Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2

[Martin Mares]

Hello!

> True.  Note too, though, that on a filesystem (which we are, after all,
> talking about), if you assume a large linear space you have to create a
> file, which means you need to multiply the cost of all random-access
> operations with O(log n).

One could avoid this, but it would mean designing the whole filesystem in a
completely different way -- merge all directories to a single gigantic
hash table and use (directory ID,file name) as a key, but we were originally
talking about extending ext2, so such massive changes are out of question
and your log n access argument is right.

                                Have a nice fortnight
-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
COBOL -- Completely Outdated, Badly Overused Language
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/