Quoting Samuel Ortiz (2012-09-19 09:02:51) > Hi Ulf, > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:21:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > From: Michel Jaouen <[email protected]> > > > > The local timer clock is based on ARM subsystem clock. This patch > > obtains a more exact value of that clock by reading PRCMU registers. > > Using this increases the accuracy of the local timer events. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Michel Jaouen <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 42 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/mfd/dbx500-prcmu-regs.h | 4 +++- > > include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c > > index 4f74529..e7f9539 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c > > @@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ static struct { > > > > static atomic_t ac_wake_req_state = ATOMIC_INIT(0); > > > > +/* Functions definition */ > > +static void compute_armss_rate(void); > > + > I'm not a big fan of forward declarations, but I still applied your patch to > my for-next branch. Thanks. >
Samuel, Not sure if you were Cc'd on the rest of the patches in this series but after some discussion (see patch #1) I took all four patches into clk-next, including the MFD change. This was done first week of September. At this point those patches have shifted into my stable branch that I have promised not to rebase (for arm-soc dependencies). Are you OK with me taking this patch through the clk-next branch? Regards, Mike > Cheers, > Samuel. > > -- > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
