* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
> Al, Eric,
>
> Was this considered before? Acceptable?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> ---
>
> Instead of an explicit hook only for audit, use a tracepoint, so that
> other users that need to know about filenames can hook there just like
> audit.
>
> Based on an earlier patch by Thomas Gleixner that added the tracepoint
> but left the audit_getname call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 5 ++++-
> include/linux/audit.h | 6 +-----
> include/trace/events/vfs.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> init/Kconfig | 2 +-
> kernel/audit.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/trace/events/vfs.h
Nice generalization and we gain a useful tracepoint as well.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
