[ add CC ]

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:26:04AM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
> 
> This commit adds dirty_background_centisecs description in bdi sysfs
> documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Trivedi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi 
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi
> index 5f50097..6869736 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi
> @@ -48,3 +48,28 @@ max_ratio (read-write)
>       most of the write-back cache.  For example in case of an NFS
>       mount that is prone to get stuck, or a FUSE mount which cannot
>       be trusted to play fair.
> +
> +dirty_background_centisecs (read-write)
> +
> +     It is used to start early writeback of given bdi once bdi dirty
> +     data exceeds product of average write bandwidth and
> +     dirty_background_centisecs. It works in parallel of
> +     dirty_writeback_centsecs and dirty_expire_interval based periodic
> +     flushing mechanism.
> +
> +        It is mainly useful for tuning writeback speed at 'NFS Server'
> +     sothat NFS client could see better write speed.
> +     A good use case is setting it to around 100 (1 second) in the NFS
> +     server for improving NFS write performance. Note that it's not
> +     recommended to set it to a too small value, which might lead to
> +     unnecessary flushing for small IO size.
> +        Setting it to 0 disables the feature.
> +
> +     However, sometimes it may not match user expectations as it is based
> +     on bdi write bandwidth estimation. The users should not expect this
> +     threshold to work accurately.
> +     Write bandwidth estimation is a best effort to estimate bdi write
> +     speed bandwidth. But it can be wildly wrong in certain situations
> +     such as sudden change of workload (including the workload startup
> +     stage), or if there are no heavy writes since boot, in which case
> +     there is no reasonable estimation yet.
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to