On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 08:52 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Your patch looks odd, though. Why do you use some complex initial > value for 'candidate' (nr_cpu_ids) instead of a simple and readable > one (-1)?
nr_cpu_ids is the typical no-value value for cpumask operations -- yes this is annoying and I keep doing it wrong far too often. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
