Return the value obtained from extcon_find_cable_index() instead of -ENODEV.
Fixes the following smatch info: drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c:478 extcon_register_interest() info: why not propagate 'obj->cable_index' from extcon_find_cable_index() instead of -19? Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <[email protected]> --- drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c index 946a318..e996800 100644 --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ int extcon_register_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj, obj->cable_index = extcon_find_cable_index(obj->edev, cable_name); if (obj->cable_index < 0) - return -ENODEV; + return obj->cable_index; obj->user_nb = nb; -- 1.7.4.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
