> > + } else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->affinity)) > > + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, data->affinity); > > > > You meant to use 'affinity' (instead of data->affinity) in the above 2 > statements > right? Note that we do chip->irq_set_affinity(data, affinity, true); further > down. >
Yes, I have noticed it, used data->affinity here is just for avoiding compile warning. in fact affinity == data->affinity, but affinity pointer is const type, And cpumask_clear_cpu needs non-const type,so here I am using data->affinity, instead of changing code "const struct cpumask *affinity;"
