On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 06:56 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jens,
> >  this patch has been sitting in my -next tree for a little while and I was
> >  hoping for it to go in for the next merge window.
> >  It simply allows bio_split() to be used on bios without a payload, such as
> >  'discard'.
> >  Are you happy with it going in though my 'md' tree, or would you rather 
> > take
> >  it though your 'block' tree?
> 
> It should go through my tree, especially since we've got conflicts with
> other changes. In other words, your patch does not apply to for-3.7/core
> as-is...
> 
> Shaohua, could you resend an updated variant?
Here is the one applied to for-3.7/core


Subject: block: makes bio_split support bio without data

discard bio hasn't data attached. We hit a BUG_ON with such bio. This makes
bio_split works for such bio.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <s...@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de>
---
 fs/bio.c |   28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux/fs/bio.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/bio.c 2012-09-28 15:09:38.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/fs/bio.c      2012-09-28 15:25:38.955252846 +0800
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ struct bio_pair *bio_split(struct bio *b
        trace_block_split(bdev_get_queue(bi->bi_bdev), bi,
                                bi->bi_sector + first_sectors);
 
-       BUG_ON(bi->bi_vcnt != 1);
+       BUG_ON(bi->bi_vcnt != 1 && bi->bi_vcnt != 0);
        BUG_ON(bi->bi_idx != 0);
        atomic_set(&bp->cnt, 3);
        bp->error = 0;
@@ -1485,20 +1485,22 @@ struct bio_pair *bio_split(struct bio *b
        bp->bio2.bi_size -= first_sectors << 9;
        bp->bio1.bi_size = first_sectors << 9;
 
-       bp->bv1 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
-       bp->bv2 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
+       if (bi->bi_vcnt != 0) {
+               bp->bv1 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
+               bp->bv2 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
+
+               if (bio_is_rw(bi)) {
+                       bp->bv2.bv_offset += first_sectors << 9;
+                       bp->bv2.bv_len -= first_sectors << 9;
+                       bp->bv1.bv_len = first_sectors << 9;
+               }
 
-       if (bio_is_rw(bi)) {
-               bp->bv2.bv_offset += first_sectors << 9;
-               bp->bv2.bv_len -= first_sectors << 9;
-               bp->bv1.bv_len = first_sectors << 9;
-       }
-
-       bp->bio1.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv1;
-       bp->bio2.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv2;
+               bp->bio1.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv1;
+               bp->bio2.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv2;
 
-       bp->bio1.bi_max_vecs = 1;
-       bp->bio2.bi_max_vecs = 1;
+               bp->bio1.bi_max_vecs = 1;
+               bp->bio2.bi_max_vecs = 1;
+       }
 
        bp->bio1.bi_end_io = bio_pair_end_1;
        bp->bio2.bi_end_io = bio_pair_end_2;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to