On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Rick Hohensee wrote:
[I wrote]
> >ask. So far that's the best I can do - all documentation is a pile of
> >notes
> >+ CVS log.
[snip]
> That sounds like an especially fascinating pile of notes. Perhaps you
> could pile it next to the patch on the ftp site?
You know, CDA is dead and gone, but I really doubt that putting this
pile as-is in any vicinity of this account would be a good idea.
Besides, half of them will need a translation - I doubt that 80Kb of
grep output intermixed with comments in English and Russian, some of
them printable, would be useful. Fasicanting - maybe, but... IOW, turning
that into documentation will take some efforts.
Cheers,
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Alexander Viro
- RE: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Peter J. Braam
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Li... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Rick Hohensee
- [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Alexander Viro
- [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Manfred Spraul
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Li... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces fo... Sandy Harris
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespace... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process name... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-proc... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-proc... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-proc... Marco d'Itri
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-proc... Alexander Viro

