On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 18:19 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > I've started looking at playing with the NAPI code again, and trying to > > see if I can add an ENAPI interface (Even Newer API), where the driver > > uses its own interrupt thread, and instead of having the polling in the > > network softirq, it can do the polling in its own thread. > > It's pretty close to the behaviour I enforced with this change. Let's > play with that and figure out what influence it has on the network > throughput performance on RT. That needs probably a different > scheduling scheme than what Carsten needs for his deterministic > behaviour. >
I was actually looking at the change for mainline, not for -rt ;-) -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
