I got system stall after the following warning with 3.6:
> WARNING: at /work/build/linux/block/blk-cgroup.h:250 blk_put_rl+0x4d/0x95()
> Modules linked in: bridge stp llc sunrpc acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf
> ipt_REJEC
> T nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0 #1
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff810453bd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d
> [<ffffffff810453ef>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
> [<ffffffff811d5f8d>] blk_put_rl+0x4d/0x95
> [<ffffffff811d614a>] __blk_put_request+0xc3/0xcb
> [<ffffffff811d71a3>] blk_finish_request+0x232/0x23f
> [<ffffffff811d76c3>] ? blk_end_bidi_request+0x34/0x5d
> [<ffffffff811d76d1>] blk_end_bidi_request+0x42/0x5d
> [<ffffffff811d7728>] blk_end_request+0x10/0x12
> [<ffffffff812cdf16>] scsi_io_completion+0x207/0x4d5
> [<ffffffff812c6fcf>] scsi_finish_command+0xfa/0x103
> [<ffffffff812ce2f8>] scsi_softirq_done+0xff/0x108
> [<ffffffff811dcea5>] blk_done_softirq+0x8d/0xa1
> [<ffffffff810915d5>] ? generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x9f/0xd7
> [<ffffffff8104cf5b>] __do_softirq+0x102/0x213
> [<ffffffff8108a5ec>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xb6/0xbb
> [<ffffffff8104d2b4>] ? raise_softirq_irqoff+0x9/0x3d
> [<ffffffff81424dfc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> [<ffffffff81011beb>] do_softirq+0x4b/0xa3
> [<ffffffff8104cdb0>] irq_exit+0x53/0xd5
> [<ffffffff8102d865>] smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x34/0x36
> [<ffffffff8142486f>] call_function_single_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
> <EOI> [<ffffffff8101800b>] ? mwait_idle+0x94/0xcd
> [<ffffffff81018002>] ? mwait_idle+0x8b/0xcd
> [<ffffffff81017811>] cpu_idle+0xbb/0x114
> [<ffffffff81401fbd>] rest_init+0xc1/0xc8
> [<ffffffff81401efc>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
> [<ffffffff81cdbd3d>] start_kernel+0x3d4/0x3e1
> [<ffffffff81cdb79e>] ? kernel_init+0x1f7/0x1f7
> [<ffffffff81cdb2dd>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xb8/0xbd
> [<ffffffff81cdb3e3>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x101/0x110
blk_put_rl() does this:
if (rl->blkg && rl->blkg->blkcg != &blkcg_root)
blkg_put(rl->blkg);
but if rl is q->root_rl, rl->blkg might be a bogus pointer
because blkcg_deactivate_policy() does not clear q->root_rl.blkg
after blkg_destroy_all().
Attached patch works for me.
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nom...@ce.jp.nec.com>
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index f3b44a6..5015764 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ static void blkg_destroy_all(struct request_queue *q)
blkg_destroy(blkg);
spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
}
+
+ q->root_blkg = NULL;
+ q->root_rl.blkg = NULL;
}
static void blkg_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
@@ -333,7 +336,7 @@ struct request_list *__blk_queue_next_rl(struct
request_list *rl,
/* walk to the next list_head, skip root blkcg */
ent = ent->next;
- if (ent == &q->root_blkg->q_node)
+ if (q->root_blkg && ent == &q->root_blkg->q_node)
ent = ent->next;
if (ent == &q->blkg_list)
return NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
