On 10/10/2012 01:54 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/01/2012 02:35 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> From: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >>> >>> Currently we rely on all IRQ chip instances to dynamically >>> allocate their IRQ descriptors unless they use the linear >>> IRQ domain. So for irqdomain_add_legacy() and >>> irqdomain_add_simple() the caller need to make sure that >>> descriptors are allocated. >>> >>> Let's slightly augment the yet unused irqdomain_add_simple() >>> to also allocate descriptors as a means to simplify usage >>> and avoid code duplication throughout the kernel. >>> >>> We warn if descriptors cannot be allocated, e.g. if a >>> platform has the bad habit of hogging descriptors at boot >>> time. >>> >>> Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Grant Likely <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Paul Mundt <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Lee Jones <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >> >> Looks good. >> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > So what do we do with this patch? Grant? > > I think the change is good to get in ASAP and since I > now have one patch in pinctrl depending on it I have > tentatively applied it there. > > Nobody sent any irqdomain fixes for this merge > window, maybe this is the only relevant patch...
I say merge it with what depends on it. There's been plenty of time for review. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
