On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:35 -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> 
> This is by accident; it looks like the code does 
>    val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
> in p6_pmu_disable_event() so that events are never truly disabled
> (is this a bug?  should it be &=~ instead?).  

I think that's on purpose.. from what I can remember p6 only has a
single EN bit (on PMC0) that acts for both counters. So what I did was
treat that as a global enable/disable (which it is) and did the local
enable/disable by using the NOP events.

There really might be bugs in there, its not like I use this class of
hardware very frequently (nor do anybody much it seems).


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to